[Infectious]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Completely untrue. You can go back and read the thread. I really don't know why you think lying will change the post history.

At one point I mentioned Shaman DPS because if the group really wants the Shaman to DPS they can. Based on the DPS numbers I've given vs. what other people have given, a Shaman can produce DPS close to a non-Epic Mage.

You simply twisted my words and blew it out of proportion because you weren't winning the argument via logic and facts. This is a common tactic of yours, you troll people who disagree with you.

Groups generally don't have the Shaman DPS because:



Usually groups want the Shaman's utility, and they have enough DPS already.

A Shaman can open up more camps that level 60's would want to do. That is why I would take a Shaman over a Mage any day. There are some camps Enchanters cannot do, or the camp is made much easier by having a Shaman. DPS has diminishing returns, and level 60's aren't going to be doing as much mass killing of mobs. They will be targeting named mobs to kill. With 350 DPS you'll kill Fungi King in 50 seconds. With 270 DPS you'll be killing Fungi King in 65 seconds. That 15 second faster kill isn't going to get you any more Fungi King kills in a single session. You would need to kill Fungi King for 120 hours straight to get an extra spawn from that.

Case closed. He clearly showed proof.