Quote:
Originally Posted by Smoofers
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
You criticize the news org for assuming motive, and in the next breath, assume the motive of the writers themselves. I hope that in time you realize how much of a dummy you are.
|
I'm not a ne s organization parading itself as an arbiter of facts.
The irony is I didn't actually assume motive.
Read the op again.
Quote the part where I assume their motive aside from stating they have a motive (which is a demonstrably provable assumption considering they are parading their assumption as fact despite it not being a fact, so obviously there must be a motive to do so.
I didn't actually ponder on this assumption of motive, I just stated A motive existed, you filled in the rest yourself. I even posted it as a question. That's a false equivalency.
Are you capable of reading comprehension?