Quote:
Originally Posted by Snaggles
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I’m glad it’s taken 27 pages to conclude a knight might be optimal at tanking casual content. It’s basically the crux of the first post of this stupid thread. No, in normal situations warriors don’t do substantially more dps than knights. No, epics won’t fix all a warriors aggro problems with 30 second fights.
If a warrior needs to believe they are the best tank for all situations they are sorely mistaken but likely won’t accept the fact.
If a knight feels warriors have no place with group content because someone else might occasionally get hit. Same thing.
If you are in seb and not wearing kunark gear it shouldn’t be challenging. Just fill the “tank” roll with anyone and move on.
|
So there you have it Group EXP equals easy.
Knights get over monks better damage and mitigation.
Best group exp tank (cuz it is easy) is Ranger with best aggro tools, Damage, utility and awareness when Named pops.
What don't like Ranger mitigation and HP pool, meh, should have gotten a warrior. After all warriors have better damage than knights.
In conclusion, poor knight classes.