Quote:
Originally Posted by enjchanter
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Warrior is the only tank that has to even worry about managing their aggro because they are so horrible at it.
Paladins and sks even get to wear a shield so they're arguably more tanky than a warrior. Warriors get evasive so yes that wins but monks pretty much have evasive full time anyway.
A warrior tank gives me the opposite of confidence. A warrior tank makes me think "okay great so I really need to be careful or I'm guaranteed to be dead because our tank couldn't hold aggro if he wanted to"
Also I don't even know what your statement about stats even means. Warriors don't get exclusive buffs or gear that other tanks could get. In fact paladins bring their 200pt hp buff ! Warriors bring nothing
|
this is such a based take.
any warrior worth his salt has no agro issues; a bag full of forlorn totems means this is a non issue.
warriors have loads of weapons that can tash, snare, root, slow, rune, avatar, generate serious threat, and do solid DPS.
they have clickies that can allow them to sow and invis themselves and others, levitate, provide damage shields, provide attack buffs, see invis, etc, etc, etc.
they have an insanely overpowered disciplines that allows them to increase their hp pool by ~30% for 3 minutes every 7 minutes.
are they better than every other tank in every scenario? no. but on the whole its not even close. this guy just doesnt know how to play a warrior.