AP unbiased he says.
Your entire argument is hinged on the idea that ideas need to be controlled. You keep going back to that and it's ultimately why you are wrong.
Controlling ideas is bad, bad ideas will stand on merit or they won't. How on earth would you propose anyone controlling acceptable speech?
Group X: This speech actually causes me harm. It must be stopped.
Group Y: I'm sorry my opinion bothers you.
Group X: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
|