Quote:
Originally Posted by magnetaress
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
It would be less of a problem if 1v1 combat on private property was legal and the state had no jurisdiction there on private property.
The best way is for people to choose their friends wisely and be well armed and vigilant. And sober at all times.
I do not fucking understand at all how we can live in this society in this day and age where if someone wrongs us we have to rely on the charity of disinterested and disconnected beuracrats and police.
|
I’d be down for a 1v1 combat resolution, just not against a woman obv
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Another way would be to ensure that you have left off with every past sexual partner such a great relationship, that no amount of money could ever entice them to lie about you. Because the amount of money offered would be relative to the perceived influence of the male target. For example, I’m sure the gal that testified against Judge Kavanaugh got shitloads of donor money and money from news orgs
So you either have to buy their permanent lifelong allegiance yourself, or somehow foster it through a solid lifelong connection. Bad breakups will fuck you over. And the ex deciding she’s no longer the same political party as you could fuck your over
This is why it’s technically impossible to completely protect oneself from a metoo