Quote:
Originally Posted by Lampolo
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I like this take. What can other classes do for me is the correct way to gauge classes in a game where dependence on others is so critical.
I feel like the classes I listed fall short in what they offer when compared to other classes for the things I am interested in doing. I would never reject a necro as a dps in an xp group but I would rather have another class. If a necro was healing for the group. I would be spamming clerics desperately. If i had an sk or pally tanking I would be happy to see them rep'd by a warrior. The listed classes do not fit in any of my ideal compositions because they are not the best at any one thing that equates to more xp/pp for me.
|
Ok, so PVE is the crux of the thread? Yet you say...
Warriors are better than sk's and pallies for group tanking.
Nothing about how horrible wizards are in almost every group situation.
Druid's are better than rangers in groups.
Remind me again what we are warning the new players against.