Quote:
Originally Posted by loramin
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I'm arguing that it's reasonable to assume, when you're having a conversation with someone and they don't respond for two years, that they aren't interested in continuing the conversation. I would argue this applies to any conversation: one on Reddit, one with a real life friend over email, one with a company you sent feedback to ... or one with a P99 developer.
If you don't consider two years to be reasonable a reasonable time frame for such an assumption, how many years do you think it should take?
|
Stop assuming conclusions and making these comparisons to emailing friends or whatever. If anything nilbog let the community know "possible channelling changes are on the radar". He doesn't need to tell all the status updates or if he's focusing on some other low hanging fruit or whatever.
You are assuming he 'isn't interested in continuing the conversation' when maybe he doesn't want to be pestered by folks or cry babies, or maybe has a policy of just contributing to the bug report rather than updating on status. I'm sure there's hundreds of other reasons, no clue why the conclusion is "well... devs think channeling is fine since he didn't say anything in 2 years. Must hate classic."