Quote:
Originally Posted by Snaggles
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I discounted a lot of this assuming you were trolling but do you actually think FSI and racial advantages are in the same ballpark as discs or class mechanics? Have you been on the healing or tanking side of a warrior and a knight? It’s a notable difference.
While I appreciate the notion a flexible group doesn’t need a warrior it’s pretty common sense in 2023. Most the exp content people grind could be druid tanked. I also wouldn’t shun a warrior (unless the person was awful). Generally filling groups based on what is available is the path with a concurrent player base of 400-800 people.
Bards don’t have aggro songs anymore. Sorry to break it to you.
|
First of all yeah, I used to raid on a dwarf cleric, and group. In groups there is no difference, and Knights are vastly superior to warriors for the sheer fact I dont like breaking my chs just to celestial elixir a nob dps that has no self restraint. I also dont like rebuffing same dps nob when he dies.
Also why micromanage a warrior in zerk when I can get a monk in group thats just as durable and puts out more damage without the need to float his hp? Oh yeah, he can pull reliably too with easier access to cheesing spawns to snipe rares.
FSI talks go in the FSI thread. Math is there.
Only reason you say I was a troll is because you didnt like neither the content of what I said, nor the truth of it. Thats a you problem clownboy.
Youre saying snare/slow doesnt build massive amounts of agro? Link the change in the notes.