Quote:
Originally Posted by Botten
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I read and quoted the parts that pertained to the argument you answered in less than 10 minutes of me posting it. What is your gripe?
|
You didn't quote the most important paragraph:
Quote:
|
The recommendation of requiring documentation of persistent gender incongruence is meant to prevent regret. However, it's important to ask who ultimately has the authority to determine whether individuals have the right to make decisions about their bodily autonomy that they may or may not regret? Cisgender women undergo breast augmentation regularly, which is not an entirely reversible procedure, yet they are not required to have proof of documented incongruence. It is assumed that if they regret the surgery, they will learn to cope with the regret or will have an additional surgery. Transgender individuals also deserve the right to bodily autonomy and ultimately to regret the decisions they make if they later do not align with how they experience themselves.
|
They are telling you (within your own link) that the ultimate goal is 'gender affirming care' without parental consent
There is no distinction made of the 'Individual's' age and if they regret castrating themselves tough shit
The reality is these procedures are very expensive and The Government is paying for many of them. Planned Parenthood is one of the largest providers of these insane Frankenstein Experiments. $$$$ Grift $$$$