Quote:
Originally Posted by unsunghero
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Almost all true, except no free dope, not that I’ve heard of anyway
And the homeless drug addicts are a separate issue. One based around how expensive it is to involve the legal system in removing someone’s freedom, to force drug treatment on someone, drug treatment that has a dogshit success rate without the person also having a support system (friends, family, job) in place…which they probably never had or else fucked up and burned those bridges forever. It’s cheaper and easier to let them kill themselves with hard drugs, much much cheaper
But, there is also some credence to some racketeering going on with local state’s homeless programs. Quite a lot of money being thrown around with almost no success, possibly some corruption there
|
San Francisco is the prime culprit, they give them drugs and alcohol at tax payer expense.
As far as treating the drug users, most don't want to be helped. The problem is, cities are being destroyed inside and out with liberal policies that only compound the problem. Businesses and corporations are fleeing in droves from liberal cities, it's simply unmanageable. Their residents are also fleeing, it's not safe nor profitable any longer. When you allow criminals to rampage the city with no recourse while we ALL pick up the tab via higher prices and tax increases, there's a serious problem that's untenable.
So, either continue to throw money and drugs at the problem, let criminals run free while their cities die or try another approach. How many liberal cities must be destroyed before something changes?
They'll just continue to party on deck while the ship sinks. It's moronic and people are stupid sheeple. It would be laughable if it weren't so sad.