View Single Post
  #48  
Old 07-17-2023, 01:29 PM
Seducio Seducio is offline
Banned


Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,343
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cd288 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
No regeants kind of doesn't make sense IMO. It's a massive part of the Mage class for instance. So it's not really a true 1 on 1 in the sense of what your post is trying to accomplish. If you want a real answer then you can't just eliminate someone's toolkit by not allowing regeants. Now gear is one thing, not allowing something that prevents a massive spell line from being used is another.
I find this compelling in terms of fairness. Who would benefit most from adding reagants back in? Probably Mages and Necros.

It's possible Melee's could make similar argument regarding having their hands tied behind their backs with no weapons. Outside of Monks and Bards the other Melees only have their fists, spells, and harmtouch for SK. On the other hand adding weapons can really change certain power dynamics given some weapons and procs power.

This is why I initially decided to make the scenario no gear and no regeants. I can see it binds a few classes in this contest back a little unfairly. Currently more inclined to let in regeants than weapons. If reagents were allowed how much better do the Mages and Necros do. It seems liked these pets could be neutralized with root etc.

Appreciate the discussion so far
Reply With Quote