Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Crede is providing strawmen because he cannot provide evidence. It is one of the many reasons this thread https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...d.php?t=406923 has gone on so long. He's usually reasonable in other threads, so I am not sure why he keeps doing it.
He cannot seem to accept that a duo/trio/four player group is killing things that are mostly tankable with Slow/Torpor, which is why a Cleric isn't required for a group like that. Shaman/Enchanter/Monk is a very strong trio, as an example.
The point of this video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jG1Aat1XdbI wasn't to show maximum DPS potential of a Shaman, which he would know if he actually read the thread. He often times doesn't based on what he posts. It is to show that you can use a solo video like this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5XwiGKTuu2E to mimic group DPS and provide an accurate example of a specific class's DPS.
The idea that you couldn't use a solo video to show class DPS was one of key reasons for hundreds of pages of trolling.
I am not sure why Crede thinks a pickup group with a 54 Necromancer and a 57 Enchanter in HS west is going to be an example of a maximum efficiency level 60 group. I certainly never said that.
I have provided multiple videos and math examples for my claims, while he still provides nothing. |
Notice all the irrelevance.
He Talks around everything except the fact that his shaman failed to even remotely output dps in a group as was requested very early on in the thread. Also failed to show how shamans are worthy of adding in place of a cleric, when the other group members can easily fill the role of a shaman.
So just wanted to warn you of what to expect.