Quote:
Originally Posted by fortior
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Why is the ‘farm crew’ setup invalid, it’s not a different type of group, it’s just the best way to setup your group. Sorry you don’t plan for moving around lol. Sorry DSM but you’re still playing tic tac toe while everyone else moved on to chess years ago. EQ1 is an extremely easy game, playing a solo shaman should be laughed at, its the EQ class version of ‘dude who peaked in high school’. All the melees have velious gear and primals now, enchanters have 2k life unbuffed, it’s over, you have no purpose anymore
|
It's not an invalid setup, but it is a different setup. Having people solo in different places isn't a "group" in the way people think, it is players pooling their resources.
Playing a Shaman is fine, and there are a lot of 60 Shamans that still play. Not sure why you are just saying random stuff that can be disproven with a /w all 60 shaman lol. You are making my point by saying EQ is easy. You don't need to CH pets to be efficient, precisely for that reason.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gloomlord
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
You have a weird obsession with glorifying Shamans and downplaying Mages. Two can play at that game.
Well done for making a video that completely missed the point of what we were talking about.
|
Mages are a fun class. I don't dislike them at all. The class just has a double whammy of having an extremely hard to get Epic combined with no real CC. They often end up as CoTH bots because of their limitations. I wish it wasn't so.
My video didn't miss the point at all. People were claiming solo videos can't be used to show how gameplay works in a group scenario, such as DPS, and they are wrong. That was the whole reason for hundreds of pages of trolling. Sorry you wasted your time with the trolling. Now you need to bring evidence showing proof of your claims that a Shaman is going to be vastly inferior to a Cleric or Mage when grouping with an Enchanter.