Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I've said multiple times I am willing to test it in person, lets do it! You just never actually commit. If you are actually willing to test in person, just PM me and we can set up a date + time. I just posted a video yesterday of myself and Pint doing some testing with SKs. It was fun! So you have proof that I am willing to do it. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CJwu-fFy0dk |
The problem here is that the SK was a trivial test. This test is much more complex, and we'd need to establish multiple points of measurement. I think it's fair to say nothing of this magnitude has ever been attempted before. Also, we have no idea what "Best" means in the context of the OP. Does this mean best for farming xp, best for sniping nameds across the world, etc.
For example, if this is a raw xp/hour test, shaman's need very specific conditions to optimize their group dps. Things like killing mobs slowly enough to regen pox/bane mana, epic being able to run it's full duration, etc. This is why most shaman's just click jbb when they are in groups. The other group members would effectively have to leave your mobs alone to truly optimize Shaman dps. This is why most shaman's just end up soloing, where they have 100% control of the situation.
This is really a matter of dps vs utility. You'd effectively need to prove that a shaman's utility can offset the increased dps of a mage(it's already been established that mages are superior group dps). Since the group would already have 3 rooters, 2 slowers, and mala with an cleric/enc/enc/mage, we'd need to try and compile a list of mobs that we believe either needs torpor to win, or needs a 4th rooter, or a 3rd slower, or a slightly tankier class, or all of the above or some combination of those.
I honestly don't know how we could test this, but willing to discuss criteria. I don't believe we should be talking about splitting up group members for optimizing named mob kills. In 99.9% of situations a "group" stays together in the same zone, so I think we should at least make that rule.