Quote:
Originally Posted by Toxigen
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Its still cleric / chanter / monk no matter how many pages DSM argues for shaman.
|
https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...37&postcount=8
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toxigen
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Eh. Typically if you're getting a port, it will come w/ SoW too. Unfortunately EQ is going to be more about mastering 1 camp / dungeon at a time and then moving on to the next after a few (or many) levels.
SoW potions are a cheap way to have access to movement speed buffs as well.
While not quite as strong, another composition that would work extremely well would be an all iksar SK / Monk / Shaman / Necro.
You get to start in the same area right at character creation, fantastic 1-20 leveling between Field of Bone and Kurns, amazing synergy between all those classes, 3x Feign Deaths / the shaman can gate when shit hits the fan, shaman SoW, and later on the necro can bring amazing damage charming undead. Did I mention Iksar master race?
Its just played a bit differently....but would be FAR more forgiving for completely untwinked and inexperienced players. As long as the shaman continues to play, anyone else could quit and the group would still perfectly capable.
Just food for thought. I always wanted to do an untwinked static sham / necro / monk trio.
|
You know what I am referring to with a Shaman, and agree they synergize well. I am not sure what content you think requires a Cleric.