Quote:
Originally Posted by Gloomlord
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
"Shamans are the second best solo class in the game, even though we're talking about a 4 man group here where 2 classes render him obsolete".
Genius! Much like a "pocket cleric" not being a 5th member, right?
My suggestion isn't that it "cannot work" -- it's that it's "meaningless".
You've lost the argument, do you realise that?
|
The reason why Enchanters are the best solo class is because they are the most powerful class overall. It's not a coincidence. Why do you think people want multiple Enchanters on the same team? The same logic follows with a Shaman and a Monk for their respective roles.
The argument that redundancy renders a class obsolete is extremely silly when you advocate for 2 Enchanters on the same team. That is the definition of redundancy, but it is still a great idea.
I think the issue here is you don't understand enough about the game to realize a 4 man group is not a very good number on P99. Most people prefer trios because you don't really expand the amount of content you can do with 4 people, and loot splits better 3 ways. You generally want 5-6 people for the harder single group content.
And yes, plenty of people have pocket clerics. Thinking otherwise is simply naïve. Guilds have cleric bots too, so you may not even need to level one up yourself.
Saying something is "meaningless" is meaningless by itself. Again, I am not sure why we have to trust you on this.