Quote:
Originally Posted by greatdane
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
If by "almost every context" you mean literally only maintanking raid bosses and no other aspect of the game whatsoever. That is the one and only activity in the entire game where warrior is not by far the worst class for its archetype. Imbecile.
The last thing I want in an XP group is a tank who can't hold aggro reliably. In what harebrained world do people prefer the tank of an XP group being marginally more tanky over having the mobs actually stay on the tank? In XP content, you don't wanna wait ten seconds for the tank to secure aggro before engaging. Anyone who thinks the halfling XP bonus (5% divided across the group lmao) makes up for that kind of horrendous inefficiency, or the healer having twice as much downtime because someone other than the tank has aggro half the time, is functionally retarded. Warrior is a trash class for every Everquest activity except tanking the content that requires defensive.
Oh. My mistake. I thought you were actually being serious, but now I see that you're just kidding.
|
When you get off your sk or dps class and actually try to do anything other than a pickup group or a zerg raid you'll find warrior is superior. When someone is trying to actually get something done in game they are looking for a monk or a war for trios groups and raids. Sk or pally is always second choice