View Single Post
  #1  
Old 03-16-2023, 12:31 AM
Patriam1066 Patriam1066 is offline
Planar Protector

Patriam1066's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 5,329
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Trexller [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
give it time

stuff like crossing flight path at just meters, dumping fuel onto the aircraft, and wing-clipping the propeller like they did to crash it, isn't some rogue pilot being a douche bag with a fighter jet, these are carefully orchestrated tests to gauge a NATO response to further russian agression outside of ukraine's borders, this data will be used to try and guess how they will respond to an actual attack outside ukraine, or vastly increased aggression inside ukraine.

I think NATO has responded well, with UK and German jets covering the airspace while the US navy recovers the reaper drone.

We could totally run our own air cover for the operation, but this sends a clear message: "When we said article 5, we really meant article 5"

its so obvious, if some pilot had done this without approval all the way up to the kremlin, he would experience some "troubles" upon arrival back at base.

yet our media carries the narrative of "a pilot's unprofessional behavior"

bs gtfo its a study the enemy operation ordered by the kremlin.
I would’ve still shot them down and recovered the pilots to then tie cinder blocks to their legs and dump them alive in the Black Sea on live television dubbed in Russian

But your way is probably best

Quote:
Originally Posted by aussenseiter [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I think the US decided to scuttle the drone so they could complain.

Russians claim no impact.
Well by all means let’s take the Russians at their word, what have they ever lied about ?
__________________
God Bless Texas
Free Iran
Reply With Quote