Quote:
Originally Posted by Basanos
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
What you're doing here, possibly inadvertently, is letting CEOs off the hook while pitting one poor person against another. That serves only the goals of the owner class. The fact that you've adopted this mentality means the owner class has accomplished their mission - your opinions of the poor are condescending and you feel more solidarity with management than you do the fellow poor.
If you are going to talk about the causes of crime, you have to be comprehensive.
|
I’m sorry the CEO is not forcing poor people to shoplift. That’s too much mental gymnastics for me to agree there, gonna have to agree to disagree on that
How are my opinions of the poor condescending again? I JUST said that this negatively impacts their lives in FAR more significant ways than their CEO. So HTF is that being condescending? Trying to look out for them?
Yea man, personal feeling of security in life, jobs, being able to buy goods locally, and physical safety I’ll go ahead and virtue signal for. I’ll skip being smug about it though, I don’t get the same sort of pleasure always perceiving to be taking the moral high ground you guys do