Quote:
Originally Posted by Messianic
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
To dismiss something because it cannot produce the kind of evidence you demand - at present - is itself more erroneous than simply believing something that isn't transferable to others by a common means - science and reason alone.
Immanuel Kant disagrees with you and Christopher Hutchens and your categorical mistake. Again, you need to be a better Atheist. Right now you're just a comfortable hedonist.
Don't you see that's a fallacy in itself? To believe something without redundant, scientific (aka experiential) evidence isn't necessarily wrong - it's just nontransferable and at present, unverifiable by common means. You may dismiss it as irrelevant, but you don't know any more or any less than that which you categorize as a fallacy.
Did I argue that I did or you should? Why bring this in? Again - you reaffirm to me that you choose Atheism as a reaction, not as a genuine attempt to believe what is true. You simply dislike what the red team does, so you choose blue team. Sounds like a brilliant move.
Keep allowing the government to use morals built from individuals who believe they should control most of your life since they're more intelligent and more evolved than you - and your individual choices are ruining the world and must be controlled.
Hell, you don't even know where I stand or how I choose my political philosophy and you've categorized me as part of 10-15% of the Republican party. That's probably more evidence than I need to know how you choose how to live the rest of your life.
|
Atleast you're eco-friendly. You built your wall of text out of bullshit haha. You sound retarded. The fact is you can't believe there's a pen in your hand unless you prove it.
It's not a big deal bud, it's just this Jesus guy and his pops are innocent until proven guilty. Imaginary until proven reality. y'know?