Quote:
Originally Posted by Cen
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I liked everything you wrote except that ;D
|
What I meant was, I played the game back in the day, and I've also read a ton of old comments and guides about on the Wayback machine. It is
factually accurate to say:
- Enchanters were primarily a grouping class back in '99-'01 (and only very rarely charmed in groups)
- While they certainly did solo charm, it was done with great risk (which led to #1)
You can't convince me otherwise, because that's history. But you could (hypothetically) convince me that the mechanics here are accurate. I don't currently buy it, but I could be convinced otherwise.
Similarly, you won't convince me that it's classic for Bards to swarm 100+ mobs; despite what I wrote about them swarming, they didn't (or at least 99.99% didn't) swarm 100+ back in '99-'01.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cen
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
By the way, what do you think of Shaman's in contrast to classic? It's got a similar notoriety to some extent.
|
I'm absolutely in favor of any "nerfs" to make Shaman (or any class) more classic
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I just don't have the passion to advocate for any because A) personally, having played Loramin both here and on live, I hadn't noticed anything unclassic, and B) I'm kind of over Loramin. I still play him some, but I've already relived my live experience with him.
What I now want is the classic experience of being an Enchanter; thus my advocacy.