Quote:
Originally Posted by Encroaching Death
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
What's hilarious is the AP tries to debunk the claim, yet a few paragraphs down it says:
"Specifically, researchers found that rates of pulmonary embolism blood clots in the lungs met the threshold to be considered a statistical signal, which means an association between the vaccine and the health event was detected.
However, the researchers concluded in the paper that the FDA is currently not taking any regulatory actions based on the detection, because the signals are still under investigation and require more robust study.
So the study DID find that it causes blood clots.
They just need more time to come up with an excuse to explain it away.
When the AP is posting "nothing to see here!" articles, you know they're desperate.
|
Higher risk than other vaccinations? Not asking about reward.