[cyxthryth]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I find it interesting you are trying so hard to talk up Druids simply because you cannot say anything good about Shamans, for fear of me being right.

The above Quote is simply an example of you sharing your opinion of what is interesting, and you seemingly attempting - laughably - to make claims about what others or a particular/specific other can or cannot say, as if you have knowledge over what they can or cannot say and can therefore make objective claims such as that "they cannot say anything good about shamans, for fear of you being right" (which would also seem to imply that you believe you have knowledge of and cann therefore make objective claims about others' or a particular/specific other's fears).

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Any class can work fine as the fourth member, Druid and Wizard included. But it is amusing to see you struggle to try and come up with why a Druid would be superior in a general sense.

You have not provided the definition that you are using for "general", so I am not sure what point you think you are making or what fact you are refuting, or what meaning you are attempting to convey by stating "why a Druid would be superior in a general sense".

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You can get PoTG and ports from any outside Druid. Nobody has argued against people getting ports/buffs from people outside of the four man group (yet). I am sure that will probably happen now.

We are not here to "argue" - we are here to - civilly - discuss the "Best 4 person all caster/priest group" and, unfortunately for you: 4 =/= 4 + X pocket characters, which is a fact that has been previously stated to you multiple times by multiple posters.

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Snare isn't necessary. Enchanters solo perfectly fine using Charmed pets without it. When having two Enchanters and a Shaman Charm breaks are not an issue with the safety all three classes provide. I have never seen a group need snare for Charm safety.

The problem is that nobody has stated/claimed/implied that "snare is necessary", and you have simply apparently built a strawman that somebody has stated/claimed/implied such so that you can argue against that strawman. I am not sure why you have - seemingly - done that. Can you please explain for the sake of civil discussion?

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Druid charming is restricted to specific zones, so it is going to be less useful overall, and you still have the same problem of having 3x Charmed pets, which is riskier. Just pick a third Enchanter at that point since you can charm everywhere.

The above Quote is simply an example of you sharing your opinion of what is going to be "less useful overall"; which is simply your opinion (and which you have provided zero data/evidence or logic or math that supports such opinion nor explains why you hold/"argue" it).

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Alternatively, you could pick a Shaman to open up camps that charming classes have problems with.

Originally Posted by PlsNoBan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Just because you CAN do something doesn't mean you SHOULD do something and it CERTAINLY doesn't mean it's the "best" thing. Which is what this thread is about.