Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I disagree. CH is nice for the pets, but it doesn't allow you to do camps that Enchanters cannot do, like West Waste Dragons. You can still do those with Torpor, CH isn't needed.
You are putting far too much emphasis on CHing pets. With a Shaman's 75% slow your pet isn't going to be taking a ton of damage, so Torpor is fine for healing. Why do you think Shamans can Torpor/Slow tank really hard mobs? The same logic applies, only the person/pet tanking the mob differs. If anything it is better when a charmed pet is tanking, because a charmed pet is going to tank better than a Shaman. They will have more dodge/riposte/parry, and NPC AC works a bit different than player AC.
|
Why exactly could Shm/Mnk/Enc do WW dragons and Clr/Mnk/Enc could not? More than likely the monk would end up tanking and the enchanter can slow. The cleric can objectively output more healing than shaman. Their HoT is pretty close if not the same healing as torpor and doesn't reduce DPS. Their single target direct heals (without even mentioning CH) are way way better. The enchanter isn't doing much either way most likely. What makes shaman so important here? 5% more slow? Get fuckin real kiddo.