Quote:
Originally Posted by cd288
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Yet again: DSM dies on the hill that shamans do better dps than mages. When proved wrong about dps, he changes the argument to “well the extra dps isn’t that beneficial so shaman is the better choice”
This dude changes arguments at the speed of light lol
The only positive to this is he’s so obsessed with the fact that he keeps being proven wrong in this thread that he spends all his time in here; so at least he’s inflicting his insufferable presence on us in other threads
|
Not to be too pedantic but, he never actually said that, that was people being nerds or whatever.
His original statement was:
Quote:
Shaman pet + Shaman DoTs deal good damage too, so it isn't like a Mage is putting out way more DPS. They are still mostly a single target DPS toon, like Shamans.
Again, Shaman pet is pretty tanky. 2400 HP (with FoS) and Torpor is no slouch when it comes to off-tanking.
But as I said before, level range matters. I agree Mage is better before 60.
|
He stated that mages deal better dps and that they're better pre-60. He pointed out that the mage dps is basically useless in the group anyways and his perspective was that shamans offer utility and, if didn't need to, could still provide some dps. This is all literally on the first page, people just lost their shit because it's DSM and they freak out apparently when this guy talks.