Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Please show me where I did this. Your lack of reading is astounding.
I never claimed a Shaman deals more damage than a Mage, unless root/rotting.
The question has always been how much difference in DPS is a Shaman compared to a Mage, and if it matters. Clearly the answer is it doesn't matter in a four man group based on the data.
So a fresh group is going to be so pro they don't need a Shaman, but so not pro they can't level a pocket cleric? You are contradicting yourself, yet again. OP never claimed he was a noob, forming a group with other noobs, with no gear what-so-ever.
|
Dude this is so fucking funny I’m loving this. Dude sits around demanding more and more data, someone goes and does a parse in KC and proves that mages are better dps than shamans, and then this dude decides to change the argument to “well it’s just irrelevant for the group anyway”
Yeah no shit man the 4th person in a two enchanter and cleric group is kind of a pointless addition no one disagrees with that. But in this scenario we are forced to choose a fourth person and therefore the only thing that makes sense is more dps (which you agreed on Friday the best group would be three enchanters and a cleric).
Honestly I’ve never laughed harder at a thread on here before. It’s so satisfying watching you act all sanctimonious about data and then Allyshia proves you wrong with data and your response is that it’s irrelevant for the group anyway. Seriously, so funny. This is amazing watching you get destroyed after you made such a big deal out of this for like 900 posts lmaoooooooo