Quote:
Originally Posted by cd288
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Lmao I come back here after 48 hours and he’s still going after he accidentally admitted that three ench and cleric is the best 4 person option. DSM did you really have nothing better to do?
Let’s recap the most recent moving of the goalpost here when discussing mage vs shaman. Previously his argument was that he does more dps than a mage. The recent data shows that to be incorrect so now his argument shifts to “well I do less dps but that doesn’t really matter in the grand scheme of things”
This dude is unreal lmao. Every time he’s wrong he decides to change the argument from what it was before so that he can say he’s not wrong.
|
Please show me where I did this. Your lack of reading is astounding.
I never claimed a Shaman deals more damage than a Mage, unless root/rotting.
The question has always been how much difference in DPS is a Shaman compared to a Mage, and if it matters. Clearly the answer is it doesn't matter in a four man group based on the data.
Quote:
Originally Posted by PlsNoBan
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
P.S. This shouldn't need to be said but we're dealing with an imbecile so. Nobody starting a fresh lvl 1 group (as OP did) is going to level a pocket cleric to 49 and log it in and out every 5 minutes to CH a pet. This is another fucking asinine absolutely absurd idea on top of a pile of other ones you've put forth in this thread.
|
So a fresh group is going to be so pro they don't need a Shaman, but so not pro they can't level a pocket cleric? You are contradicting yourself, yet again. OP never claimed he was a noob, forming a group with other noobs, with no gear what-so-ever.