[PlsNoBan]

Ahh so a lvl 58 mage is doing more damage than a 60 shaman. Who'da thunk it?

Reminder before DSM inevitably tries to deflect and go into a bunch of irrelevant theoretical math: He contradicted himself and openly admitted shaman is only best for this group in very few niche situations. Everyone in this thread (including DSM) is now in agreement that shaman has no spot in best overall 4 person caster/priest group.

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

To accommodate said break, I will not be posting again until someone can do the following:

1. Show my data is invalid. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9-g8Ywibztg , https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5XwiGKTuu2E , and the math provided here: https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...postcount=1774

2. Provide DPS data for Mages that is different enough from Troxx's.

3. Show why saving 5 seconds on a kill is going to help the group in a meaningful way.

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Just looking at it here, the numbers are the same as Troxx's data.

Sadly he didn't keep his word here. I suspected he would not. I was hoping he'd shut the fuck up and accept his obvious defeat.