Quote:
Originally Posted by Karanis
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
By that logic, one of the members can literally have a geared 60 of every single class to swap in, and at that point it doesn't fucking matter what comp the group has because they can change it.
|
Yup, because obviously pocket clerics are just as common as having level 60 characters lol. /sarcasm.
I don't think you realize you can have a pocket cleric that is level 49 for the 90% res and Complete Heal. Between four people it wouldn't be tough to level one up during the downtime between groups.
Quote:
Originally Posted by PlsNoBan
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
He's now admitted that mage is better at royals and necro is better at fungi king. He's basically just clinging on to shaman being helpful for ixiblat and maybe like WW dragons? He's backed himself into a very tiny corner with his own words at this point. Would ANYBODY base their entire group makeup around what class makes more sense for Ixiblat? Or would you take a mage/necro that makes more sense in the vast majority of cases?
This thread really should be over. I know it won't end. But DSM literally backed himself into a tiny corner and the floor has fallen out beneath him. He's dangling by a thread and is going to continue to argue from there I'm sure.
|
I said all of this before, you just aren't reading, as usual. You simply have this strange straw man that I am obsessed with Shamans.