Quote:
Originally Posted by PlsNoBan
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
1: Mage is a better group DPS class than Shaman
2: Enchanters solo better than Warriors
These statements are not up for debate amongst sane human beings
Why does <Vanquish> allow DSM to be a member?
|
Imagine being so salty at a conversation on elf forums, you actually change your signature to include the straw men you created in a desperate effort to win a debate (but lost anyway).
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
There are 800+ posts of just insults and memes from other users because people can't admit to being wrong, or have a civil conversation. Your own posts are included in this count. Hope this helps.
The real summary of the thread is everybody has agreed that in an Enchanter/Enchanter/Cleric group, the DPS of the fourth member is irrelevant.
When comparing Mages to Shamans, everybody has agreed the only benefit you get from a Mage is a little more DPS and CoTH if you need it.
At this point it is simply preference whether you prefer a small boost in DPS and CoTH over a Shamans broad toolkit that increases safety and opens up more camps. When looking at DPS break points, the extra DPS a Mage provides over a Shaman isn't really enough to get you additional spawns unless you play for long sessions. The difference in kill speed between 200 DPS and 230 DPS on Fungi King is 89 seconds vs. 77 seconds. For 12 seconds to actually give you another Fungi King spawn, you would need to kill Fungi King/PH 150 times in a single session.
|