Quote:
Originally Posted by Gloomlord
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Right, so shaman can provide slightly more camp options...but as PlsNoBan has pointed out, that is so niche that shaman is still more irrelevant than mage if all they want is some extra DPS.
You've now switched from the root rotting argument, which you know is utterly flawed, to now saying that shaman "opens up more potential doors".
As I've said: this is a never-ending circle of insanity. You'll keep switching from one argument to another when one fails, and then go back to the same one when we've poked holes in that one. You deliberately frustrate your opponent, and then claim "SEE?! YOU'RE TROLLING!" when they tell you to piss off.
How do you not see you've lost the argument? I call your bluff.
|
This is all nonsense. If you want to know my experience (which cannot be proven with data), that has been my experience. I am not switching arguments, I have said all of this before many times. You haven't read my posts, which is why you think I am switching arguments, or root rotting is my primary argument. Root rotting isn't even included in my data lol.
I have played with the top guilds and highly skilled players. I have been on this server for years. People don't care that much about DPS. It isn't as important as safety and camp options. The reality is group content is tuned for players with average/below average gear, but most people are using gear that is above the tuned levels. So its much easier to hit optimal DPS breakpoints with all sorts of group combinations. We are not playing in 1999 where everybodies gear sucks, which is when a Mage shines.