Quote:
Originally Posted by Gloomlord
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
You keep proving my point here...
How was I trolling here, you lunatic? I said I agreed with their harsh assessment of you, but that calling you autistic may have been going too far. I was a "silent observer" until then. How was that "trolling"? Do you have a shred of intelligence?
This is it, guys! This child is beginning to snap. Can't you see it?
|
You called me childish and stubborn for no reason. I didn't do that to you when you first appeared. It's not a very civil way to start a conversation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gloomlord
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I did. You've ignored that completely, and repeated ad nauseam your data that doesn't mean squat in a 2 charm enchanter 1 cleric group.
Is it possible that, if a complete multitude disagree with you in this thread, that I'm not the one suffering from hubris here?
You, in your insanity, seem to think only you possess the secret knowledge of how shaman is going to be better than mage in this 4 man group.
Nobody, not even you, is going to believe for a second you actually have merit here or are unbiased in the slightest.
|
Data trumps experience. You haven't made one post to disprove any of the data provided, or the math given. This is a video game. The rules and math are fixed, never to change unless you cheat.
I really don't know why you think there is some deeper truth hidden outside of the basic rules and math of the game. You have yet to explain this, and instead just continue rage posting that you think I am wrong.
Debates don't work that way. You don't win by accumulating more troll posts than your opponent. You have been lulled into a false sense of security by assuming agreeing with the group makes you correct.