Insults aren't helping our case?
Respectful decorum isn't helping our case either, considering how much of a pathological liar you are.
I can see DSM's mindset: whenever we point out a hole in one of his arguments, he then points how his argument *IS* sound, because we weren't paying attention to all variables. However, his counter arguments completely ignore how niche and unlikely they are, like root rotting and Ixiblat. We point this out to him, but then he suggests "data" is on his side, even though that "data" is completely skewed and, once again, niche and unlikely.
It's a revolving circle of insanity, until we all get fed up with him and leave. Then, after it's all done, he will self-deceive himself into thinking he has "won".
Autistic? I'm not sure. Solipsistic, psychotic man-child? You bet!
|