Quote:
Originally Posted by PlsNoBan
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
The initial data you posted had shaman at like 55 and mage at 82. You kept spouting off about how it's "only 27 dps difference and dps doesn't matter when we're talking about mage dps but look how much dps my shaman does cause dps matters. Watch me root rot adds in an xp grp like a retard cause doing dps as a shaman is very important" and when I pointed out the fact that using your own numbers mage is literally 50% more dps than shaman you went and tweaked your data to show something different. Was your data wrong then? Is it wrong now? Did you really think I didn't notice?
|
You missed my edit. And I openly admitted I miscalculated the Damage Shield DPS. Unlike yourself, I can admit when I am wrong.
The numbers are 25-58%, depending on the situation. The reason why the 58% number is less likely is because the situation in which it happens is pretty unrealistic. Nobody has yet to tell me where this situation would occur at level 60. Basically your group of four level 60s would need to be pulling single mobs non-stop, killing them in 36 seconds each. The group also refuses to let the Shaman go ahead and root/rot. The only two areas I can think of where you would be pulling mobs and killing them in 30 seconds at level 60 would be Sebilis and Spiders in Velks. But in both of those locations the Shaman could go and root/rot so the group can kill more mobs at a time.
You are basically trying to force people to only play in the situation where Mages have a bit more DPS.