View Single Post
  #9  
Old 08-26-2022, 01:49 PM
DeathsSilkyMist DeathsSilkyMist is offline
Planar Protector

DeathsSilkyMist's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 8,025
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Troxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I think the problem is that he tried last night and was unable. It certainly explains this entertaining tantrum he is throwing
Incorrect. I proved it without a doubt, and you are now in full meltdown mode lol. Your own data works against you, and then you claim it is incorrect. How convenient[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] You have to resort to some silly semantics about claiming your method for data gathering is the only valid way. It's a bad argument.

Here is the data so far:

Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Here is Troxx's data for reference. It is using his own standards of being in a group for an extended period of time. He is doing... 79 DPS (without damage shield). It is the precise number I calculated. His DPS is 40 simply because he is nuking more per encounter, but math-wise this also means they aren't pulling mobs that fast. His previous encounter data shows an average kill speed of 36 seconds, and he has yet to provide average kill speed for this data set.

There are two ways you can interpret this data:

1. You can believe Troxx, who is claiming his DPS parser is undervaluing the data by 30%. If that is true, then honestly all of the data he has posted so far is meaningless because his parser is wrong, and he needs to get a better parser.

2. GamParse did it's job and parsed Troxx's DPS correctly. The reason why he thinks the data is undervalued by 30% is because his similarly equipped Monk can do 70 DPS when he isn't pulling. That is where he is getting the 30% number, 70 x 0.7 = 49. The flaw in Troxx's logic is the Monk is only losing 30% DPS because he is pulling, NOT because the parser is wrong. Troxx isn't pulling, he is just sitting in camp DPSing and parsing. He is not losing any DPS, so there is no 30% loss for him. He is basically falsely assuming that if the Monk loses 30% DPS, everybody else is losing 30% DPS too. The parser is correct, and Troxx is wrong.

Either way, he basically has nothing to back up his silly points. The burden of proof now lies on him to either provide better data, or prove his parser is undervaluing all DPS by 30%, and not just the Monk who is pulling lol.

https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...&postcount=638 - Here is real objective data for DPS comparisons between a Mage and a Shaman, using a level 49 Sebilis Mob. A Shaman can do 55.2 DPS, a Mage can do 82.7 with damage shield. The difference is only 27.5 DPS. This is a level 60 Mage vs. a level 60 Shaman, no clickies or mana buffs, and assuming the group is killing a mob every 36 seconds.
As for PlsNoBan:

Quote:
Originally Posted by PlsNoBan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I will say if I was ever mentally ill enough to attempt raiding on blue again. I don't really have any preference between VQ and Riot or whoever else. This guy is WAY more than enough reason to avoid whatever guild thinks this type of person is a good member lol. Judging by his forum habits I don't even want to imagine how much tism ends up in guild chat or discord.
He is really making himself look good by calling everybody he disagrees with autistic. Great guy, right? I am not forcing you to post this, you can stop at any time lol.
Last edited by DeathsSilkyMist; 08-26-2022 at 01:53 PM..
Reply With Quote