Quote:
Originally Posted by Troxx
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Mage is by far the laziest class I’ve played in eq. It’s so relaxing after 60 levels of bard, shaman, necro, etc. Heck it’s even easier than warrior (cause they actually do have to move around).
It’s pet attack and click the same nuke as often as mana allows. Oh … and every 15 minutes you re-haste your pet and periodically cast a damage shield.
It takes about as close to zero effort to maximize your potential compared to any other class.
|
That's irrelevant to the topic at hand. It doesn't matter which class is easier or harder.
The logic doesn't make sense. Group A wants to get a Mage because they care about DPS (kill speed efficiency). At the same time, Group A is fine with their players being lazy and not DPSing well (which lowers kill speed efficiency).
You can't have it both ways. You can't argue that a group wants a Mage for DPS, but doesn't mind the Mage and other group members slacking off and lowering DPS lol.
Better to get a Shaman at that point, because they need to pay attention more. They aren't AFKing and not /pet attacking, nuking, or buffing because they are watching Netflix.