Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
That is your projection, not the truth. You can look through my post history. I have admitted I am wrong plenty of times [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] The simple truth is when people can't win a debate with facts and logic, they resort to name calling or character attacks.
That is the sign you have lost the debate. The only thing you can do is insult [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] If I am wrong, please bring the evidence.
Troxx gave us the DPS numbers for his Mage, and I gave you the DPS numbers for my Shaman. It's really that simple. |
Your DPS numbers would never hold up in reality, lol. A mage can consistently put that out. A shaman will never have enough mobs in the camp to do that. It's simply not sustainable. Eventually the camp will be split, and you'll be sniping one at a time, in which a mage would be even better for.
You should really reconstruct your arguments. Instead of thinking "how am i going to convince people that shamans are better group dps than a group dps class" you should be thinking "how am i going to convince people that shamans utility would outweigh what a mage would bring". People might actually take you seriously then hehe.