Quote:
Originally Posted by Zuranthium
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
More idiotic strawmans. I know perfectly well. Stop acting like you are smarter or more experienced. You aren't. You're just burying your head in the sand. Classic low rank fool who is scared of thinking there is something wrong with their play, so they don't improve it and stay hard stuck at a lower rank.
|
It's not a strawman, it's a fact. You are not experienced, but you are pretending to be. This thread shows it quite clearly. You need to start playing the game again.
I have no problem with criticism. I would love to learn something from you.
The problem is you are simply responding to this thread because you are mad, not because you have worthwhile information. You just have some weird urge to try and prove me wrong in any way you can, but are failing miserably and showing how inexperienced you are.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Duik
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Loving the "I can prove my opinions" videos.
Keep forgetting, RnF.
Onward to Insanity, with a blonde!
|
Videos show reality. Anybody can type walls of text and claim it is the "truth".
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zuranthium
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
There is no pather that's going to aggro outside the distance you can see. You are not saying anything new, you're simply wrong, and playing like a little kid who can't look around a corner. Also, your own video shows how easily you can see both other dragons in the distance once you get up to the edge, you're just full of shit. And if you're paying attention, then you would already know the pather isn't nearby anyway, before you go down to the water to sit your pet before going back up.
|
I am sorry, but you don't know how pathers work in WW, or how dangerous it can be. Being a bit extra cautious saves more time in the long run. I know you like to try and save time.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zuranthium
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Completely wrong. Your other spells are costly and/or take long times to cast. Sticking a Malosini in these fights is a great investment; if it prevents even 1 resist (assuming landing on first try) you have benefited. But it doesn't need to land on first try. If your spells are getting resisted 50% of the time with no Malosini and then only 1% with it, then needing to cast Malosini 3 times in a row before it lands is still a huge investment, as you are preventing a huge number of resists from that mana spent.
|
Nope. If slow has a 95% chance of landing without Malosini, you don't cast Malosini at all to save mana. Malosini and Slow have the same resist chance, so unless the mob needs another resistance besides Magic lowered, it is a waste of Mana. Your ideas of "wasting mana" and "saving mana" are nonsense.
Malo is the best spell for this fight. I haven't seen a significant difference in resists between Malo and Malosini on WW Dragons, even 6+ Dragons
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oPxeOVuX0G8 . The resist chance numbers you are throwing around for these fights are wrong.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zuranthium
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
You cast Malo twice in your other video, because of how slow you kill. That's 700 mana and you're getting less effect out of Malo than Malosini, leading to your spells getting resisted when there's a better chance they wouldn't have if you had Malosini up. You are also taking more damage to cast Malo, because you are getting hit by rounds of attack that you otherwise wouldn't if you had used Malosini and kept running out of melee distance.
|
You didn't read my previous posts. Not surprising. I Malo twice as a habit because some pulls take a long time. It's not the kill. I am not losing any kill speed either, because my DoTs are already ticking. I would rather do it for safety. Again, I have disproven your "more DPS is faster" idea with another video. You are vastly overestimating how much time you think you are saving.
As for your taking damage while Maloing comment, you do know that WW Dragons AoE right? If I was kiting the dragon trying to land Malosini, I would also be taking damage and getting dispelled.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zuranthium
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Even IF you want to be using Malo at the start of the fight, then you should STILL be casting Malosini after it, as that's 200 mana and more impact as compared to 350 to recast Malo. You especially need to be using it when you're also weaving the poison DoT into fights. Your failure to do so is yet another thing you did wrong in your sad video where you act like you played correctly and proved something (you didn't).
|
You don't need to, because as I said above I have tested these fights with Malo and Malosini. Reality is you don't need Malosini. Sorry. You have no data to back up your claims.
I also already disproved your idea that you can "weave" Bane into the fight. It costs too much mana to maintain both Pox and Bane consistently.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UD-PCJ4tCII
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zuranthium
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
You are spending a big chuck of mana at the start of the fight by not having pet up, and you lost the time to cast another spell as the Dragon got into your melee range, because you were instead casting pet. What a clown.
|
It's not wasting any time to do so. I have tested both methods. You have tested none.
Show us a video of how fast you can kill WW Dragons. I am waiting.