Quote:
Originally Posted by Ektar
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
well maybe you didn't say it, but someone else said "it's both guilds' faults"
and to fix: as I'm trying to say, TR (though, again, I don't speak for them) is not going to give into the child holding his breath until his demands are met. They will (as IB did in the past) hold out until the child suffocates. the only fix is the kid stops holding his breath.
|
What you're basically saying is that you'd rather TMO just collapse from poopsock-induced burnout than reach a compromise with them like a mature adult would do. You're confident this will occur because it supposedly happened in the past with DA. What you're not realizing is that poopsocking still hasn't stopped, even in kunark. Even if a guild collapses in the short term from this it won't stop it in the long term; guilds will always go back to poopsocking even after a brief period of no-poopsocking.
Moreover, if you expect TMO to get burnt out from sitting in trak's lair forever, by that reasoning you should expect TR members to get burnt out as well, since they admittedly are okay with poopsocking as a response. It doesn't matter who starts it; if poopsocking can discourage members of one guild it can discourage members of the other.
I'm not a member of either guild but I'm sure both parties are mature enough to organize a rotation. It's in both their interests, and like I argued earlier, it actually encourages competition since it opens up the boss for other guilds.