Quote:
Originally Posted by Jibartik
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
You're saying that nacy, on her own, without anyone's consent, is postruing to CHINA even though that's officially not our stance?
|
Slow down, breath (and maybe use spellcheck). Do you really think Nanci freaking Pelosi, the most institutional of all institutional politicians, is singlehandedly trying to change US foreign policy?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jibartik
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Why on earth would that make sense?
|
It wouldn't. She's 100% pushing America's stance, and whether it's explicit or not, that stance
is "don't let China control that region (in particular the sea there)".
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jibartik
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Then why does the white house say that is not true?
|
Likewise, she undoubtedly discussed and planned the whole trip with the executive department, whatever they say publicly. This may come as a shock to you, but countries don't just announce their intentions on everything publicly
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jibartik
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
THEN WHY DO YOU KEEP BUILDING MANFUACTURING PLANTS THERE?!
|
Because humans in the real world (unlike these forums) can handle not going to the extreme on every topic.
Do we want to thwart China's territorial ambitions? 100%, zero doubt. Do we also want cheap Chinese goods? 110%. Both things can be true at once.