Quote:
Originally Posted by loramin
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Look you're clearly ignoring everything I say, and just repeating the same thing over and over, so again: if you have nothing new to contribute to the conversation, don't keep repeating the same shit over and over like an autistic robot.
Just say "I feel I've made my case, and I am confident an intelligent reader will be able to follow the logic of it." Here, I'll go first:
I feel I've made my case, and I am confident an intelligent reader will be able to follow the logic of it.
|
I didn't ignore what you said. You can keep saying that but it isn't true. I don't have to respond to every block of text each time when it is the same thing you have been saying.
The problem is you are the one who is repeating "95% of a Shaman's life" without defining it, and using it as an "I am right and you are wrong" argument. This is why the conversation isn't moving forward. If you could define it, then we could actually use real data to see how often you could cap STA vs. WIS, and at what points in your journey STA could be greater than WIS, or vice versa. You could even convince me over to your side!
As it stands, I am not willing to concede you made any kind of intelligent case. Your argument is simply "I have an undefined time period where STA is greater than WIS as a starting stat, and this is true without the need to define this time period".