So you said:
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Just to be thorough, there is one reason why you would want to dump into STA as your starting stat.
|
Then I tried to point there is more than one reason, and that you are incorrect, and you respond:
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Multiple users have answered this exact same question multiple times, and you ignored each post. I am not going to post the same information again just so you can ignore it again. You must have skipped over them, or sped read them poorly.
|
Well, DeathsSilkyMist has
declared there is only one reason on page 18, and now if anyone tries to show he's wrong, he'll just refuse to argue and refer them to the previous 18 pages ... without any specific logical refutation whatsoever. Seems like he has a solid argument to me
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Meanwhile, it seems to me if something has been repeated multiple times already, and is central to the entire case you're so confident you're making, it should be trivial for you to summarize it in only a few sentences. But what do I know?