Quote:
Originally Posted by Castle2.0
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
DOJ won't do crap. A real criminal case where hearsay isn't permitted?
Nah, we just wanted to make it look as bad as possible for Trump without having a real case, real judge, real lawyers, and due process.
But I know "walls closing in" right? ha
|
Explained to you already how the vast majority of statements made aren't hearsay, but ignore it all you want (or you're just unable to understand it, which a lot of people aren't - not the simplest rule of evidence by a long shot).
One of the best recent pieces of evidence btw:
"In emails reviewed by The New York Times and authenticated by people who had worked with the Trump campaign at the time, one lawyer involved in the detailed discussions repeatedly used the word 'fake' to refer to the so-called electors, who were intended to provide Vice President Mike Pence and Mr. Trump’s allies in Congress a rationale for derailing the congressional process of certifying the outcome," The Times reported. "And lawyers working on the proposal made clear they knew that the pro-Trump electors they were putting forward might not hold up to legal scrutiny."
"In a call on Dec. 27, 2020, witnesses have said, Trump told acting attorney general Jeffrey Rosen that he wanted his Justice Department to say there was significant election fraud, and said he was poised to oust Rosen and replace him with Clark, who was willing to make that assertion.
Rosen told Trump that the Justice Department could not “flip a switch and change the election,” according to notes of the conversation cited by the Senate Judiciary Committee.
“I don’t expect you to do that,” Trump responded, according to the notes. “Just say the election was corrupt and leave the rest to me and the Republican congressmen.”
The president urged Rosen to “just have a press conference.” Rosen refused. “We don’t see that,” he told Trump. “We’re not going to have a press conference.”"