Food for thought:
Could the Kyle Rittenhouse verdict actually have a silver lining in that peaceful protesters can now effectively shoot any Proud Boy who shows up to physically intimidate or harm them and claim self defense?
Can the presence of having a gun on a person actually make self defense argument stronger against someone trying to physically harm said person (ie: physical confrontation could result in loss of control of the gun, therefore any physical move against a person with a firearm can be viewed as an act of self defense).
Discuss...
|