Quote:
Originally Posted by Gustoo
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
No logic is necessary. Evidence abounds. See Mexico, See 1994-2004 USA (assault weapons ban era), real life evidence that indicates that strict weapons restrictions do not increase public safety.
To indulge in the divergence of the military versus school shooter scenario, in the military an auto loading weapon serves as a "force multiplier" where through sheer volume of fire a force of a given size is able to have a higher % of success. In the modern setting a sophisticated optic is a "force multiplier" because of the same small % increase of success. The auto loading weapon in a military setting is also supported by supply chains.
Children don't shoot back and there are no supply chains. The % increase in murder effectiveness in this scenario would be statistically insignificant. There is no evidence available anywhere that indicates that 14 kids and 1 teacher would not be dead today if the shooter was using a pump action shotgun and a revolver.
|
Yeah the reason the body count was so high wasn’t the style of gun, it was the fact police hid outside for a full hour while he killed
How any kid survived from that classroom is beyond me. If your shooter is getting bored and running out of targets in a contained setting, your police sucks
But let’s rely on only police to save us though