Wow, again loramin with the "hey if you look at this one specific, narrow sample, it's sort of higher in a specific way if you're measuring "mass shootings" by some arbitrary definition you just made up!"
That's not how statistics work. But even if it was, what is your point? An armed guard in that school would have almost certainly prevented that.
And let's say you could somehow magically wave a wand and only cops would have guns? Cool, fine, there should STILL be an armed guard in that school cause the psycho who did this could have just stabbed a bunch of kids instead.
Make a coherent argument, pearl clutching about the scary guns is just an insanely low resolution way of thinking about this problem.
|