Quote:
Originally Posted by Botten
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
It is just easier for you to make more money with money. IE if you are born into a family with less of it. It is just that harder. I mean you should know this being a farmer and all.
...
I actually can't be angry about this move.
1. From the leak it will be up to the state to decide. No lose of Abortion it is still there but the benefits of study from it and tourism to blue states is profitable.
2. Decision will take place before the midterms. Getting the blue vote out there.
3. Even more energized younger women voters along with their white knights
4. Higher taxes for Red state to pay for more mouths to feed
5. Business were further support policies against evil red states that don't care about woman health. +plus
More lose of revenue to red states who adopt these shenanigans. See last dumb republican move Mexico Shifts Trade Railway from Texas to New Mexico.
6. More protests in Red State; they hate those things.
About the only plus to republicans in this is they get more uneducated white voters to combat the already increasing immigrant population turning these states blue. |
Yeah it can only hurt the GOP
It shifts the focus from ongoing supply chain, inflation, etc issues to the never-ending abortion debate. That hurts the GOP since a community focused on a struggling economy is a community angry at the president for it, whether it’s their fault or not. And it turns suburban women against the GOP
I would have to disagree on the point where it shifts all abortions to blue states. That would only be for the people who can afford to go. A lot of the poorest people I see in my job have no transport, and can’t afford even a greyhound bus pass much less a plane ticket. So for poor people in red states, it will probably push them to try risky types of at-home abortions
The more mouths to feed is a good point tho. Banning something without putting infrastructure in place to handle a population surge is poor planning. Same issue I have with rescinding title 42/immigration