View Single Post
  #189  
Old 03-04-2022, 09:53 AM
New_Guy New_Guy is offline
Fire Giant

New_Guy's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2021
Location: Your Mom's House
Posts: 539
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cwall 146.0 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
why would I give a shit about the balance of a specific class when I don't play the game anymore?

it's very obvious that screenshot is a cherry-picked streak of resists on an extremely low sample size - even then, it shows a different number than you claim (3 resists out of 6 casts, not 3 out of 5)

I could post the video where I root a mage pet 100% of the time across 3 or 4 casts, but I know that it's pointless because A) you're going to keep arguing about in bad faith and B) 3 or 4 casts isn't a good sample size, either

I would suggest playing better instead of lobbyquesting
LMFAO you really are just a huge lying pos all the time huh?

the fact that you are arguing about lying and trying to make shit up about cherry picking or the times of root shows clearly how full of shit you are, because a shaman pet should resist zero roots 100% of the time in PvP.

1 out of 5 roots is too many resists for an unbuffed shaman pet in PvP. And the fact that you just say: "Well yea fears broken but root is fine because it's 3 out of 6 resists" shows how full of shit you are.

Why would you care? Because you only care about your epeen rep, you and kringe played mages for 2 weeks without logging off to prove to everyone you could pvp and admitting that mages are broken invalidates those 2 weeks. All you care about is proving to nerds you can play, it's your only accomplishment in life. As can be seen from your sig.

Ok here is a simpler test just 2 out of 3

https://imgur.com/a/LOrW9YK

You can clearly see it's a shit geared shamans pet and the pet resists two out of three roots and the one that landed lasted a second. And if I play a shaman and necro wtf am I lobbyquesting for Joseph Goebbles? To make my own classes weaker?
Last edited by New_Guy; 03-04-2022 at 10:09 AM..
Reply With Quote