Quote:
Originally Posted by Samoht
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
First of all, just because something is exploitable does not mean it has been exploited. The only proven cheater at this point is a Riot officer named Kickenit. Nobody wanted a rules change for the infraction. It would have been satisfactory with a punishment for the player/guild.
Second, rolling swings the solution too far into the other direction. At least ring roll allows a week of competitive turn ins. Why wasn't this mirrored for kael/dain? Why is there zero feedback or discussion with GMs for tuning this decision or proposing alternatives?
Players from both sides need to be allowed at the table. Since Riot now has an officer embedded as a GM, the only solution is to also promote a player from Vanquish to be GM.
|
So anything short of submitting video evidence of the individuals themselves actively cheating means that no cheating is occurring? Despite the fact that the engagements have been proven to be exploitable? And that nobody actively looking to benefit from said cheating would ever submit proof of themselves cheating unless they were doing it to show the engagement is exploitable so it gets fixed?
I mean, I get it. You're being deliberately obtuse to continue running the distraction in an attempt to get the engagements to remain as-is so that your team who has been actively cheating the engagements can continue being able to do so. I'm more putting this out there for the other people reading to understand how hypocritical you are being when you are saying you don't want /random to kill competition when the alternative is just as anti-competitive, only strictly benefitting any team that cheats. And that the bar for it to be proved that anybody is cheating is to submit a video of yourself doing it, otherwise anything goes.